Dallas Family Law Attorney Carmen Eiker Discusses Deion Sanders’ Social Media Divorce

On April 23, former Dallas Cowboys cornerback and NFL Hall of Famer Deion Sanders announced to the world his allegations that his wife, Pilar, played a part in a domestic assault against him when he tweeted: “Pray for me and my kids now! They just witnessed their mother and a friend jump me in my room. She’s going to jail n I’m pressing charges!” What is more concerning to some, Sanders also tweeted a picture of him and two of his children completing the police complaints describing the alleged assault. Although the photo was quickly removed from his Twitter account, the initial messages went out to Sanders’ 390000 followers — and within minutes, a media circus commenced. “That is the type of thing that really reveals a lot about a person and what their motivations may be in a particular suit,” Eiker told CBS 11’s Jay Gormley in the station’s April 24 coverage of the story. Eiker says that courts pay close attention to social media evidence generated by individuals involved in divorce, adding that a judge might now cast a wary eye at Deion Sanders for including his children in the media maelstrom surrounding their divorce. The familiar advice Eiker offers to anyone considering meting out social media justice while in the midst of a divorce: “Think before you post.”

Related Blogs

    This entry was posted in family solicitor and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

    One Response to Dallas Family Law Attorney Carmen Eiker Discusses Deion Sanders’ Social Media Divorce

    1. Currently the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s new advice definitely is reaching a lot of observation. A great deal of the news coverage is mainly based towards the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s press issues and of course, does not ever quite simply mention currently the impingement with regards to organisations.

      You know, I are aware of that the majority of job applicants really have made blunders and also paid dearly but if I encounter several consistently qualified employees and only one spot, do You provide the position to the guy which commited the mistake or perhaps to the person that never would have done a felony? While I show the tendency to wish to help the person which lived sucesfully easy money originally rather than the applicant that went to county jail.

      This could succeed inside of a scarce work target market, unfortunately, not likely this moment. As to why would an employer select a criminal when they are blessed with lots other non-offenders to positively make a choice?

    Leave a Reply